Communication Tools and E-Learning: A Revolution in the Research Methodology of Communication for a Pedagogical Scenario
Downloads
Communication is a source of motivation and cohesion, so knowing how to communicate is a way to facilitate e-learning interactions and group/class dynamics through various communication tools. Communication tools and e-learning have brought major changes to teaching and learning. These tools include online learning platforms, forums, webinars, online videos, podcasts, social media, and other advanced communication technologies. They allow learners and teachers to communicate and collaborate remotely, offering increased flexibility and accessibility. It is important to design instructional programs that effectively integrate these online learning and communication tools into the instructional scenario. E-learning allows teachers to choose from a variety of synchronous and asynchronous methods. Asynchronous methods allow for additional communication, while real-time or synchronous methods allow for in-process communication. The choice of communication tools associated with the training modules depends on the learning activity the trainer wants to perform. In this case, we recommend that you offer a variety of communication tools and design your e-learning course to meet the needs of your learners.
Rekkedal, T., & Dye, A. (2007). Mobile distance learning with PDAs: Development and testing of pedagogical and system solutions supporting mobile distance learners. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(2), 1-21.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10
Obasa, A. I., Eludire, A. A., & Ajao, T. A. (2013). A comparative study of synchronous and asynchronous e-learning resources. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 2(11), 5938-5946.Salmon, G. (2011). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. Routledge.
Robinson, P., & Cole, R. A. (2000). Issues in web-based pedagogy: A critical primer.
Goralski, M. A. (2008). The concept of implementing effective criteria for learning assessments in a virtual environment. Journal of International Business Disciplines, 2(3), 127-141.
Richard, S., Gay, P., & Gentaz, É. (2021). Pourquoi et comment soutenir le développement des compétences émotionnelles chez les élèves âgés de 4 à 7 ans et chez leur enseignant. e? Apports des sciences cognitives. Raisons éducatives, 25(1), 261-287.
Knoerr, H. (2005). TIC et motivation en apprentissage/enseignement des langues. Une perspective canadienne. Recherche et pratiques pédagogiques en langues de spécialité. Cahiers de l'Apliut, 24(2), 53-73.
Sangrà, A., Vlachopoulos, D., & Cabrera, N. (2012). Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: An approach to the conceptual framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 145-159.
Al-Samarraie, H., Selim, H., Teo, T., & Zaqout, F. (2017). Isolation and distinctiveness in the design of e-learning systems influence user preferences. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(4), 452-466.
Chu, R. J. C. (2010). How family support and Internet self-efficacy influence the effects of e-learning among higher aged adults–Analyses of gender and age differences. Computers & Education, 55(1), 255-264.
Anderson, T., & Rivera Vargas, P. (2020). A critical look at educational technology from a distance education perspective. Digital Education Review, 2020, num. 37, p. 208-229.
Horton, W. (2006). E-Learning by Design. San Francisco: Pfeiffer
Li, F. W., Lau, R. W., & Dharmendran, P. (2009). A three-tier profiling framework for adaptive e-learning. In Advances in Web Based Learning–ICWL 2009: 8th International Conference, Aachen, Germany, August 19-21, 2009. Proceedings 8 (pp. 235-244). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (4thed.). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons.
Singh, H., & Reed, C. (2001). A white paper: Achieving success with blended learning. Centra software, 1, 1-11.
Horton, 2002; Osguthorpe and Graham (2003)” The Effect of Blended Learning Model on High School Students' Biology Achievement and on Their Attitudes towards the Internet. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – April 2012, volume 11 Issue 2
Soufiane, O., & Mohamed, K. (2021). THE SPOC BETWEEN FLIPPED CLASS AND BLENDED LEARNING. Higher Education, 7, 95-105.
El Abidine, M. Z., Nejjari, A., & Khaldi, M. (2023). Mediatization of the Task in the Teaching/Learning of French as a Foreign Language. In Handbook of Research on Scripting, Media Coverage, and Implementation of E-Learning Training in LMS Platforms (pp. 315-329). IGI Global
Awan,S. H., & Paracha, R. (2018). Effective e-learning in higher education: A review of the
literature. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(3), 40-50.
Maha, K., Omar, E., Mohamed, E., & Mohamed, K. (2021). Design of educational scenarios of activities in a learning situation for online teaching. GSC Advanced Engineering and Technology, 1(1), 049-064.
All Content should be original and unpublished.
