The Strategic Role of Individualization in Higher Education Physical Education
Downloads
In the context of higher education reforms emphasizing learner-centered approaches and holistic human development, physical education (PE) is required to respond to increasing individual differences among students in physical fitness, movement experience, motivation, and developmental potential. In practice, however, individualization in higher education physical education is often narrowly interpreted as an instructional or assessment technique, while its foundational role in curriculum development remains underexplored.
Based on a theoretical study employing systematic analysis and synthesis of authoritative international and national scholarly literature, this paper examines the role of individualization in higher education physical education. The findings indicate that individualization should not be viewed as a final instructional adjustment, but rather as a guiding principle that begins with the analysis of learners’ needs and the identification of individual movement potential. Furthermore, individualization plays a critical role in enhancing effectiveness and safety, sustaining students’ motivation for physical activity, and expanding the function of physical education from mass training toward long-term human development and lifelong active lifestyles.
These findings provide a theoretical basis for reconceptualizing individualization as a core organizing principle in higher education physical education programs.
ACSM. (2021). ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
Bouchard, C., & Rankinen, T. (2001). Individual differences in response to regular physical activity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 33(6), S446–S451.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Kirk, D. (2010). Physical education futures. Routledge.
OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Publishing.
Penney, D., & Chandler, T. (2000). Physical education: What future(s)? Sport, Education and Society, 5(1), 71–87.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom (2nd ed.). ASCD.
UNESCO. (2015). Quality physical education: Guidelines for policy-makers. UNESCO.
Bailey, R., & Collins, D. (2013). The standard model of talent development and its discontents. Kinesiology Review, 2(4), 248–259.
National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). (2026). Research and education resources on college athletics. NCAA.org.
Copyright (c) 2026 Nguyen Xuan Bien, Tran Xuan Bach

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All Content should be original and unpublished.

