The objective of this research was to help the pupils of Offinso College of Education Practice School specifically, basic five pupils to overcome the difficult understanding of the concept of magnetism. The study involved the use of interview, questionnaire and observation as instruments to solicit for information about pupils’ previous and current performances before and after the intervention scheme was implemented. The researcher use bars of magnet and magnetic substance as an intervention to assist the pupils of Offinso College of Education Practice School Basic five to overcome the poor understanding of the magnetism concept. The findings revealed that the use of proper teaching methods as well as the appropriate teaching and learning materials will enhance or improve pupils’ poor understanding of the concept of magnetism in basic five. The researcher also has the belief that if his suggestions are taken into proper consideration, pupils’ difficulty in understanding and their low interest in science shall remain a thing of the past.
Magnetism, understanding, teaching methods
American Association for the Advancement (2003).Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., &Razaview, A. (2002).Introduction to research in education (6thed). Text: USA.
Ashton, P. & Crocker, L. (1987).Systematic study of planned variation.The essential focus of teacher education reform.Journal of teacher education 38, 2 – 8.
Atwood, R., Christopher, J., &McNall, R. (2006).Middle school teachers understanding of standards-based light concept before and after instruction. San Francisco, CA.
Atwood, R.K. & Christopher, J.E. (2007).Pre-service elementary teachers’ understanding of standard-based magnetism teachers’ understanding of standard-based magnetism concepts.Paper presented at annual meetings of the Association for Science Teachers Education, January, 3 – 6, Clearwater, FL.
Atwood, R.K., Christopher, J.E., &McNall, R.M. (2007).Are in-service elementary teachers prepared to teach fundamental concepts of magnets and the behaviour of magnets? New Orleans, LA.
Ayodele (1984).Characteristics of learners from two with widely different backgrounds. United Kingdom.
Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gay, L.R. (1999). Educational research competencies for analysis and application Columbus. Ohio: Charles F. Merrill Publishing Company.
Hawley, W. &Rosenholtz, S. (1984). Good schools, what students achievement. Peabody journal of education, 61(4) and 22.31.
Jackson, P.W. (1968). Life in the classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston publisher.
Jackson, P.W. (1968). Life in the classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston publisher.
Learner, J. (2000).Learning disabilities theories diagnosis and teaching strategies (8th Ed). Boston: Houghton Mifflin company.
Lockhead, M.E. &Komeman, A. (1988).School effects on students achievement in Nigeria and Switzerland. Washington D.C.
McCarthy, D.J. (1973). New perspective on teacher education. London: Jossey-Bass publishers.
McDermott, L. (1991). Milikan Lecture 1990: What we teach and what is learned: Closing the gap American Journal of physics. 59, 301 – 315.
McDermott, L., Heron, P. Shaffer &Stetzer, M. (2006).Improving the preparation of k-12 teacher through physics education research.American Journal of physics. 74, 763 – 767.
Prawat, R.S. (1989). Teaching for understanding: Three key attributes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(4) 3/5 – 328.
The world book Encyclopedia (1996). Ed volume 16 world book, inc.Fetze London Sydney. Toronto: Scott Fetza Company
Alonzo, A. C., &Steedle, J. T. (2008). Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression. Science Education, 1-33. Retrieved October 24, 2008, from
AAAS Project 2061. (2001). Atlas of Science Literacy. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Bar, V., Zinn, B., & Rubin, E. (1997).Children’s ideas about action at a distance. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 1137-1157.
Barrow, L. H. (1987). Magnet concepts and elementary students’ misconceptions. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Second International Seminar – Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, Cornel University, Ithaca.
Bodner, G. (2008). Personal conversation, October 30.
Borges, A. T., &Glibert, J. K. (1998).Models of magnetism.International Journal of Science Education, 20, 361-378.
Bradamante, F., Michelini, M., &Stefanel, A. (2006). Learning problems related to the concept of field. In B. G. Sidharth, F Honsell and A. de Angelis (Eds.), Frontiers of Fundamental Physics. The Netherlands: Springer.
Bradamante, F., &Viennot, L. (2007).Mapping gravitational and magnetic fields with children 9-11: Relevance, difficulties and prospects. International Journal of Science Education, 29(3), 349-372.
Catley, K., Lehrer, R, and Reiser, B. (2004).Tracing a Prospective Learning Progression for Developing Understanding of Evolution. Paper commissioned by the National Academies Committee on Test Design for K-12 Science Achievement. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press.
Clement, J. (1991).Nonformal reasoning in experts and in science students: the uses of analogies, extreme cases and physical intuition. In J. F. Vos, D. N Perkins and J W. Segal (Eds.), Informal Reasoning and Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Erickson, G. (1994). Pupil’s understanding of magnetism in a practical assessment context: the Relationship between content, process and progression. In P. Fehsham, R. Gunstone, & R. White (Eds.), The content of Science. London: Falmer.
Gilbert, J. K., &Boulter, C. (1995, April).Stretching models too far. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Fransisco.
Guisasola, J., Almudi, J., &Zubimendi, J. (2004). Difficulties in learning the introductory magnetic field theory in the first years of university. Science Education, 88, 443-464.
Guth, J. (1995). An in-depth study of two individual students’ understanding of electric and magnetic fields.Research in Science Education, 25, 479-490.
Guth, J., &Pegg, J. (1994).First-year tertiary students’ understandings of iron filing patterns around a magnet. Research in Science Education, 24, 137-146.
Johnson, A. (1999). Students' development of models of magnetic materials, patterns of group activity, and social norms in a physics classroom. Unpublished dissertation, San Diego State University and the University of California, San Diego.
Maloney, D. (1985). Charged poles? Physics Education, 20, 310-316.
Meyer, K., Carlisle, R. (1996). Children as experimenters. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 231-248.
Kennedy, C. A., & Wilson, M. (2007).Using progress variables to interpret student achievement and progress. BEAR report series, 2006-12-01. University of California, Berkeley
National Assessment Governing Board. (2006). Science assessment and item specifications for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress (Prepublication ed.). Retrieved October 29, 2008, from http://www.nagb.org/frameworks/naep%5 Fscience%5Fspecs%5F2009%5Fre.doc.
Mohan, L. Chen, J., & Anderson, C. W.(2008, April). Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems. Presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore, MD.
Plummer, J., &Krajcik, J. (2008). A learning progression for celestial motion. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore.
BEAR Report Series, SA-97-1. University of California, Berkeley.
Saglam, M., & Millar, R. (2006). Upper high school students’ understanding of electro-magnetism. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 543-566.
Smith, C., Wiser, M., Anderson, C. W., and Krajcik, J. (2006).Implications of research on children’s learning for assessment: Matter and atomic molecular theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 14, 1-98
Wiggins, G. and McTighe, J. (1998).Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Yunker, M. (2008).A learning progressions for understanding content, cyclic nature and timescales associated with the rock cycle. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore.
Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, R. (1994).Making sense of secondary Science. London: Routledge
Everston, C.W., Hawley, W., &Zlotnik, M. (1985).Making a difference in education quality through teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 2-12.
Guyton, E., &Farokhi, F. (1997). Relationships among academic performance basic skill subject matter knowledge and teaching skills of teaching education graduates. Journal of Teacher Education, 38, 37-42.
Boshier, P. (2007). Invisible Parties: Listening to Children. New Zealand: Wiley Press Room.
Wade, B. & Moore, M. (1998). An early start with books: literacy and mathematical evidence from a longitudinal study. Educational Review50, no.2: 135-145.
Johnston, M. & Susan, M. (2012). Theories and techniques of behavior change, Health PsychologyReview, 6:1, 1-6.
Alexander, R. (2000). Culture & Pedagogy: international comparisons in primary education, Oxford: Blackwell.
Ferguson, P. & Womack, S.T. (1993).The Impact of Subject Matter and on Teaching Performance. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 155-163.
Melton, G.B. (2005).Child Abuse and Neglect. USA: Clemson.
Barrow, L. (1990). Elementary Science textbook and potential magnet misconceptions. School Science and Mathematics, 90, 176-720.
Bronfenbrenner, V. (1996). Ecology development: Developmental Psychology, vol. 22(6), pp 723-742.
David, B.D., gosling, B., &LeTendre, G.K. (2002). Socioeconomic Status School Quality, and National Economic Development: Comparative Education Review, vol. 46(3), pp 291-312. (Chicago; University of Chicago Press).
Johnson, A.P. (2012). A short guide to action research (4th Ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Clement, J., Brown, D., &Zietsman, A. (1989). Not all preconceptions are misconception: Finding anchoring conception for grounding instruction on students’ intuitions. International Journal of Science Education, 11: 554-565.
Azikiwe, U. (1998). Study approaches of university students; WCCI Region II Forum vol.2, Lagos. Pp. 106-114.
Emerllahu, D. (2001). Edukata Estetike, Prishtine. Pp. 147.
Claudia, &Eberhard , M. (2008). Child Education Parenting. Albanian: Nehemia.
National Research Council (1996).National Science Education Standard. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Gardner, H., &Boix-Mansilla, V. (1994).Teaching for Understanding. New York: Basic Mind.
Mills, G.E. (2011). Action Research: A guide for the Teacher Researcher (4th Ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Hickey, R., &Schibeci, R. (1999).The attraction of magnetism. Physics Education, 34, 383- 388.
Finley, F. (1985). Evaluation Instruction: The complementary use of clinical interview. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 635-650.
Gallagher, J.J. (2000). Teaching for understanding and application of science knowledge. School Science and Mathematics, 100(6), 310-318.
Wildey, H., 7 Wallace, J. (1995).Understanding teaching or teaching for understanding: Alternative framework for science classroom. Journal of research in Science Teaching, 32(2), 143-156.
Constantinou, C., Raftopoulos, A., &Spanoudis, G. (2001). Young children’s construction of operation definition in magnetism: The role of cognitive readiness and scaffolding the learning environment. Proceedings of Twenty-third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.(J. Moore & K. Stenning,Eds.). Routledge.
Toleman, M.N. (1998). Hands-on science activities for grades K-2. West Nyack, NY: Parker Publishing Company.
Pilot, D.F., & Hungler, B.P. (1999). Nursing Research: Principles and Methods (6th Ed.). Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.
Streubert Speziale, H.J., & Carpenter, D.R. (2003).In Qualitative Research in Nursing (3rd Ed.), (pp. 58-59). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.