The Relationship between Usability and User Experience on User Interface Design of Smart Grid Mobile Applications

DATE PUBLISHED
March 25, 2018
SECTION
Articles

Abstract

The balance between usability and user experience in a mobile app user interface design is important. In addition to being easy to use, the application also needs to have an attractive design for use by users. In this study aims to determine the relationship between usability and user experience on the design of user interface design smart grid mobile applications. Usability testing uses System Usability Scale (SUS) and user experience testing using User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). The result of testing the relationship between usability with user experience got the value of 0.603. The value of 0.603 included into relationship level "strong".

Keywords

Usability, User Experience, User Interface Design, Smart Grid, Mobile Applications

References

N. Bevan, “Human-Computer Interaction Standards,” Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Hum. Comput. Interact., no. July, 1995.

A. Hussain, H. I. Abubakar, and N. B. Hashim, “Evaluating Mobile Banking Application : Usability Dimensions and Measurements,” Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Multimed., no. 1, pp. 136–140, 2014.

D. S. Pradana and R. Ferdiana, “Mobile applications rating assessments based on users experience perception,” Proceeding - 2014 Makassar Int. Conf. Electr. Eng. Informatics, MICEEI 2014, no. November, pp. 175–179, 2014.

M. Pratama, N. A. Setiawan, and S. Wibirama, “User Interface Design for Android-based Family Genealogy Social Media,” 2017 7th Int. Annu. Eng. Semin. (InAES), Yogyakarta, Indones., 2017.

SMB Smart Grid Strategic Group (SG3), IEC Smart Grid Standardization Roadmap, 1.0., no. June. 2010.

M. Ferreira, “Energy management application for smart grids aiming at mobile device,” 2013 IEEE PES Conf. Innov. Smart Grid Technol. Lat. Am. (ISGT LA), 2013.

A. S. Patttanayak, B. S. Pattnaik, and B. N. Panda, “Implementation of a Smart Grid System to Remotely Monitor, Control and Schedule Energy Sources Using Android Based Mobile Devices,” 2014 9th Int. Conf. Ind. Inf. Syst., 2014.

T. Vaughan, Multimedia: Making It Work, 6th ed. Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI, 2006.

K. Y. Zamri and N. N. Al Subhi, “10 User Interface Elements for Mobile Learning Application Development,” 2015 Int. Conf. Interact. Mob. Commun. Technol. Learn., 2015.

[K. Kuusinen and A. M. A. Development, “On Designing UX for Mobile Enterprise Apps,” 2014 40th Euromicro Conf. Softw. Eng. Adv. Appl., 2014.

R. Harrison, D. Flood, and D. Duce, “Usability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model,” J. Interact. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 1, 2013.

M. Song, H. Song, and F. Xiangling, “Methodology of User Interfaces Design Based On Android,” 2011 Int. Conf. Multimed. Technol., pp. 408–411, 2011.

T. S. Tullis and J. N. Stetson, “A Comparison of Questionnaires for Assessing Website Usability,” Usability Prof. Assoc. Conf., pp. 1–12, 2004.

A. Garcia, “UX Research | Standardized Usability Questionnaire,” 2013. [Online]. Available: https://chaione.com/blog/ux-research-standardizing-usability-questionnaires/. [Accessed: 06-Jan-2018].

J. Brooke, “SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale,” Usability Eval. Ind., vol. 189, no. 194, pp. 4–7, 1996.

A. Bangor, P. Kortum, and J. Miller, “Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale,” J. usability Stud., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 114–123, 2009.

Z. Sharfina and H. B. Santoso, “An Indonesian adaptation of the System Usability Scale (SUS),” 2016 Int. Conf. Adv. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. ICACSIS 2016, pp. 145–148, 2017.

H. B. Santoso, R. Y. K. Isal, T. Basaruddin, L. Sadita, and M. Schrepp, “Research-in-progress: User Experience Evaluation of Student Centered E-Learning Environment for Computer Science Program,” 2014 3rd Int. Conf. User Sci. Eng., pp. 52–55, 2014.

N. Ibrahim, W. Fatimah, W. Ahmad, and A. Shafie, “User Experience Study on Folktales Mobile Application for Children’s Education,” 2015 9th Int. Conf. Next Gener. Mob. Appl. Serv. Technol., pp. 353–358, 2015.

M. Schrepp, “User Experience Questionnaire Handbook,” pp. 1–11, 2017.

B. Laugwitz, T. Held, and M. Schrepp, “Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire,” HCI Usability Educ. Work, vol. 5298, pp. 63–76, 2008.

H. B. Santoso, M. Schrepp, R. Yugo Kartono Isal, Y. Utomo, and B. Priyogi, “Measuring User Experience of the Student-Centered e-Learning Environment,” J. Educ. Online-JEO, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 142–166, 2016.

L. Faulkner, “Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing,” Behav. Res. Methods, Instruments, Comput., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 379–383, 2003.

H. Medyawati, “Factors Affecting The Intention Of Using Internet Banking : A Case Study On One Of The National Private Bank In Indonesia,” J. Internet Bank. Commer., vol. 22, no. 3, 2017.

J. Tarigan, “User Satisfaction Using Webqual Instrument: A Research on Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET),” J. Akunt. dan Keuang., vol. 10, pp. 34–47, 2008.

Author Details

Edi Susilo

  • Student, Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
  • Google Scholar
  • RAJAR Journal

F. Danang Wijaya

  • Lecturer, Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
  • Google Scholar
  • RAJAR Journal

Rudy Hartanto

  • Lecturer, Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
  • Google Scholar
  • RAJAR Journal