Contaminant Crossover in Residential Energy Recovery Ventilators: Mass Spectrometric Analysis and Introducing Remediation Measures
Downloads
Energy recovery ventilators (ERV) are increasingly present in residential environments to enable energy-efficient provision of controlled outdoor air ventilation. In this work, we investigated pollutant transport through a typical residential ERV as a potential pathway for re-entrainment of indoor air pollutants into the outdoor ventilation air supplied to an indoor space. Specifically, we investigated the transfer of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) through the sandwiched membrane matrix of the ERV core, between two adjacent air streams. Pollutant transfer efficiency is calculated for experiments intentionally injecting two common indoor VOCs (acetone, isopropanol (IPA)) and the behavior of transfer is studied for different ERV exhaust and supply flowrates (supply, exhaust, balanced scenarios). Maximum pollutant transfer efficiency of 17% is recorded for isopropanol at balanced (equal supply and exhaust airflow rates) conditions at intake and exhaust air lines. Maximum pollutant transfer efficiency of 26% and a minimum of 5.3% for unbalanced CFM settings are obtained. For VOCs studies, we observed short response times of <10s from starting injection of VOCs into indoor exhaust air stream until the concentration at the indoor supply air stream reaches to steady state. This results concluded that, ERVs typically have a lower response time to pollutant re-entrainment.
A. Cincinelli and T. Martellini, “Indoor Air Quality and Health,” IJERPH, vol. 14, no. 11, p. 1286, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111286.
L. Zhong, F.-C. Su, and S. Batterman, “Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Conventional and High Performance School Buildings in the U.S.,” IJERPH, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 100, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.3390/ijerph14010100.
J. T. Rosbach, M. Vonk, F. Duijm, J. T. van Ginkel, U. Gehring, and B. Brunekreef, “A ventilation intervention study in classrooms to improve indoor air quality: the FRESH study,” Environ Health, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 110, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-110.
P. Yang, L. Li, J. Wang, G. Huang, and J. Peng, “Testing for Energy Recovery Ventilators and Energy Saving Analysis with Air-Conditioning Systems,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 121, pp. 438–445, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.1090.
E. L. Hult, H. Willem, and M. H. Sherman, “Formaldehyde transfer in residential energy recovery ventilators,” Building and Environment, vol. 75, pp. 92–97, May 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.01.004.
H. Patel, G. Ge, M. R. H. Abdel-Salam, A. H. Abdel-Salam, R. W. Besant, and C. J. Simonson, “Contaminant transfer in run-around membrane energy exchangers,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 70, pp. 94–105, Feb. 2014,
doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.11.013.
Ryan Huizing, Hao Chen, Frankie Wong, “Contaminant transport in membrane-based energy recovery ventilators,” Science and Technology for the Built Environment, no. 21, pp. 54–66, 2015.
C. Boardman and S. V. Glass, “Moisture transfer through the membrane of a cross-flow energy recovery ventilator: Measurement and simple data-driven modeling,” Journal of Building Physics, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 389–418, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1177/1744259113506072.
N. D. Weerasekera and A. Laguerre, “Coupled Continuum Advection-Diffusion Model for Simulating Parallel Flow Induced Mass Transport in Porous Membranes,”, "International Journal of Science and Research" vol. 8, no. 12, p. 7, 2019, pp 694-700. DOI: 10.21275/ART20203395
N. D. Weerasekera and S. Cao, “Multifaceted Convergence Study for Evaluating Gas Diffusion Parameters of Polymeric Membranes,” IJEAS, vol. 6, no. 11, Nov. 2019, pp 57-63, doi: 10.31873/IJEAS.6.11.21.
K. K. W. Tang and M. R. Mahmud, “The Accuracy of Satellite Derived Bathymetry in Coastal and Shallow Water Zone,” Int J. of BES, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1–8, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.11113/ijbes.v8.n3.681
All Content should be original and unpublished.
