Modelling of Educational Scenarios Based on the Coupling of Explicit Teaching and Guided Discovery Learning Approaches in an E-Learning Context
Downloads
The objective of this article is to present and illustrate an educational engineering approach relating to the use of structure (SD), activity (AD) and Vee (V) diagrams in the design and modeling of educational scenarios. in alignment with a model of hybrid pedagogical approach: explicit - by discovery strongly requested recently in the practices of distance and online education. We first analyze the basic pedagogical approach of distance education, then we present and illustrate how to use these diagrams in scriptwriting.
Schuster D., William W., Cobern B., Adams A J., Undreiu A., &Pleasants B,. 2017,. Learning of CoreDisciplinaryIdeas:EfficacyComparison of TwoContrasting Modes of Science Instruction. Research in Science Education.
Stockard, J., Wood T., Coughlin C., &RasplicaKh C., 2018,. The Effectiveness of Direct Instruction Curricula: A Meta-Analysis of a Half Century of Research. Review of Educational Research, 88 (4), 479-507
Hattie, J. A. C., 2009,. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, UK: Routledge.
Bissonnette, Steve, Gauthier, Clermont, Richard, Mario, Bouchard, Carl., (2010). « Quelles sont les stratégies d'enseignement efficaces favorisant les apprentissages fondamentaux auprès des élèves en difficulté de niveau élémentaire ? Résultats d'une méga-analyse », Revue de recherche appliquée sur l’apprentissage, vol. 3, no 1, p. 1-35.
Apprendre et enseigner aujourd’hui. Revue du conseil pédagogique interdisciplinaire du Québec. Volume 8. N°2. Septembre 2019. www.conseil-cpiq.qc.ca
Rosenshine B(2012). Explicit Instruction : a model elaborated from research on classroom instruction and validited by research on human cognitive processing. In Apprendre et enseigneraujourd’hui: L’enseignementexplicite. La revue du conseil pédagogique interdisciplinaire du Québec. Volume (2) , N(8). 2019.
Gauthier, C., Bissonnette, S., & Richard, M. (2013). Enseignement explicite et réussite des élèves, Montréal : E.R.P.I.
Barth Britt-Mari. Jérôme Bruner et l'innovationpédagogique. In: Communication et langages, n°66, 4ème trimestre 1985. pp. 46-58.
Glaser K., 2013,.The Neglected Combination: A Case for Explicit-Inductive Instruction in Teaching Pragmatics revue tesl du cana da. 163 (30), special issue 7.
Sweller J., Kirschner P A., & Clark R. E., 2007,. Why minimally guided teaching techniques do not work: a reply to commentaries. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 115–121.
Archer A L., A. Hughes C A., 2011. Explicit instruction: effective and efficient teaching. Karen R.Harris and Steve Graham, Series Editors.
Hake R R., 1998,. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: a six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics,. 66 (1), 64–74.
Hassard J., 2003,. Direct-interactive teaching model., https://www.jackhassard.org/mos/di9.html
Lawson A E., 2010,. Teaching inquiry science in middle and secondary schools,. Washington, DC: SAGE.
Peterson P E., 2011,. Eighth-grade students learn more through direct instruction. Education Next, 11(3).
Rosenshine B., 2008,. Five Meanings of Direct Instruction. Center on Innovation &Improvement, Academic Development Institute.
Wright J., 2013,. Introducing Academic Strategies to Students: A Direct-Instruction Approach,. http://www. interventioncentral.org/academic-interv entions/general-academic/introducing-academic-strategies-studentsdirect. Consulté le 11 mars 2020.
Kelly Y L Ku., Irene T Ho., Kit-Tai Hau., & Eva C M Lai., 2014,.Integrating direct and inquiry-based instruction in the teaching of critical thinking: an intervention study. Instructional Science volume 42. 251–269
Adimoto A., Goodyear P., Bliuc A M., &Ellis,R.A., 2013,. Inquiry-based learning in higher education: principal forms, educational objectives, and disciplinary variations. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 1239-1258.
Erika T M., 2014,. Using a combined Approach of Guided Inquiry& Direct instruction to Explore How Physiology Affects Behavior. The American Biology Teacher. Vol.76, N°9.
Holyoak K J., Morrison R G., 2005,. The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
Ausubel D P., Novak J D., and Hanesian H., 1978,. Educational psychology: a cognitive view (Second Edition). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Novak D J., &Gowin B., 1984,. Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Alvarez M C., and Risco V J., 1987a,. Veediagrams: helping students underst and the structure of knowledge. Washington, DC.: Paper presented at meetings of the American Educational Research Association.
Novak J D., 1990,. Concept maps and Veediagrams: two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaning full earning. InstrSci 19, 29–52.
Novak D J., &Gowin B., 1984,. Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kurniasih S., and Irpan A M., 2019,. Diagram Vee and mind mapping application to develop conceptual understanding of plant reproduction. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.
Thiessen R., 1993,. The Vee Diagram : A quide for Problem solving. Aims Newsletter.
Aysegul E., Kaan B., Serkan Y., 2012,. The effect of using v-diagrams in science and technology laboratory teaching on preservice teacher’s critical thinking disposition. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 2267 – 2272
All Content should be original and unpublished.
