Legal Certainty on The Implementation of Death Criminal Decisions that have Permanent Law Power in Indonesia (A Review of the Death Criminal Decision on Narcotics in 2014-2018)
Downloads
The principle of legal certainty applied to the principle of extra ordinary crime is contrary to the respect for humanity as the most fundamental human rights principle and the principle of legality is associated with positive law and international conventions. The results of this study are intended to seek or find arguments for the certainty of the execution of the death penalty for the community, family, convicts and the state, so that the research on death penalty decisions in narcotics cases that occurred from 2014 to 2018. This research method is included in normative juridical law research. The conclusion is, sentencing with the threat of the death penalty can still be applied in Indonesia in narcotics crime cases is appropriate. Therefore, the death penalty, of course, state law does not conflict with religious law/teachings, in other words, the death penalty does not conflict with the first precepts because the first principle of Pancasila is Belief in One God, which means based on the beliefs/religions of each person who in carrying out/believes His religion is also guaranteed in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, which is contained in Article 28 E paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) and Article 29 paragraph (2).
O. C. Kaligis and Associates, Narkoba dan Peradilannya di Indonesia, Reformasi Hukum Pidana Melalui Perundangan dan Peradilan. Bandung: Alumni, 2002.
E. Karsono, Mengenal Kecanduan Narkoba dan Minuman Keras. Bandung: Yrama Widya, 2004.
M. Vintan, Dessy Hasanah, and M. Irfan, “Keberfungsian Sosial Bagi Mahasiswa Penyalahguna New Psychoactive Substance Di Universitas Padjadjaran,” J. Penelit. PKM, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 166, 2017.
L. H. Martono and S. Joewana, Menangkal Narkoba Dan Kekerasan : Belajar Hidup Bertanggung Jawab. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2006.
BNN, “Deputy for Eradication of BNN.” Badan Narkotika Nasional, Jakarta, 2019.
James, Candu Tempo Doeloe, vol. 2016. Jakartan: Komunitas Bambu, 2012.
F. Merz, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2017, vol. 2, no. 1. 2018, pp. 85–86.
V. V. L. S. Herindrasti, “Drug-free ASEAN 2025: Tantangan Indonesia dalam Penanggulangan Penyalahgunaan Narkoba,” J. Hub. Int., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 20, 2018.
B. N. Arief, Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 1998.
B. Manan, “Pembinaan Hukum Nasional,” Suara Pembaharuan, Bandung, p. 11, Aug. 18, 1997.
Solusihukum, “Lihat Penghapusan Pidana Mati Menuntut Sejumlah Perubahan Undang-Undang,” solusihukum.com, 2009. .
T. M. Lubis and A. Lay, “Kontroversi Hukuman Mati,” Kompas, Jakarta, p. 26, 2009.
B. N. Arief, Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana dalam Perspektif kajian perbandingan, vol. 53, no. 5. Bandung: PT. Citca Aditya Bakti, 2015.
A. Rahim, Hukuman Mati, Problem Legalitas dan Kemanusiaan. Malang: N.Trans Institute, 2015.
S. Tanusubroto, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Acara Pidana. Bandung: Amrico, 1989.
Muladi, Hak Azasi Manusia, Politik dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana析Title, vol. 10, no. 1. 1995.
L. Marpaung, Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana: Di Kejaksaan & Pengadilan Negeri, Upaya Hukum & Eksekusi, vol. 10, no. 1. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.
D. Sitanggang, Kepastian Hukum Masa Tunggu Eksekusi Pidana Mati. Bandung: PRC Pustaka Reka Cipta, 2018.
A. Zainal, Pengantar Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2012.
B. L. Tanya, Teori Hukum, Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang dan Waktu. Yogjakarta: Genta Publishing, 2010.
C. Huda, Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kealahan. Tinjauan Kritis Terhadap Teori Pemisahan Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 2006.
Maroni, Politik Hukum Pidana. Lampung: AURA, 2016.
M. Ali, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.
Mahkamah Konstitusi, “Putusan Perkara No. 2/PUU-V/2007,” Jakarta, 2016.
P. Aruro, “Hukuman Mati Bagi Pengedar Narkotika Dalam Konteks Uu No. 22 Tahun 1997 Dan Perubahan Uu No. 35 Tahun 2009,” Lex Adm., vol. 7, no. 3, p. 1820, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/monografias/GEBIS - RJ/RBG/RBG 1995 v57_n1.pdf%0A https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/rbgfe/article/view/234295.
K. Anam, “Komisioner Komnas HAM RI,” Jakarta, 2020.
S. Jaya, “Hakim Tinggi Mahkamah Agung,” Jakarta, 2020.
R. S. Silitonga, “Jawaban tertulis dari Dirjen PAS,” Jakarta, 2021.
PEN, “Masyarakat yang tidak setuju artinya pandangan terhadap pelaksanaan hukuman mati atas dasar pertimbangan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM).,” Jakarta, 2021.
A. A. Budiman, “Laporan Situasi Kebijakan Hukuman Mati di Indonesia 2020: Mencabut Nyawa di Masa Pandemi,” Jakarta, 2020.
H. Citrawan, “Hak Hidup VS Hukuman Mati dalam Perspektif Hukum dan HAM,” Humanis, vol. 2, p. 4, 2014.
All Content should be original and unpublished.
