Factors That Affect Performance Appraisal Of Civil Servants For The Ministry Of Education Staff In Nairobi Province
The study set out to assess how performance appraisal tools affect performance appraisal of Ministry of Education civil servants in Nairobi province, determine the extent to which standard or yard sticks affect performance of the civil servants, establish if involvement in setting of the targets and use of feedback influence performance appraisal and find out if demographic factors influenced the performance appraisal system of civil servants in Nairobi Province. The study adopted a descriptive survey design. The target population consisted of the 285 employees of the ministry of education based in Nairobi. Out of these, 30 representing approximately 10% were randomly selected for study. Data was collected using questionnaire method and was analyzed using frequency distribution tables, pie charts, histograms and percentages. Data were collected from respondents with different portfolios in the ministry of education such as clerical officers, secretary’s, auditors, quality assurance officers and quality assurance supervisors from different departments. The study also revealed that all respondent were aware of the existence of performance appraisal. The responses indicated that majority of the participants were conversant with performance contract. Lack of effectiveness of performance appraisal was blamed on delay in receiving performance appraisal forms, which in turn delayed the whole process of appraisal. The appraisal tools were however termed as lacking in identifying training needs and therefore did not help those appraised to improve through training. This study revealed that respondents were often appraised by an older person. The appraisers more often had more work experience than the
respondents creating confidence in the whole exercise. It emerged majority did not get feedback of the results of performance appraisal denying them an opportunity to learn through their mistakes. Recommendations were aimed at increasing access to appraisal resources, participation in appraisal process and ensuring feedback to enhance appraisee learning through previous mistakes.
performance appraisal, appraisers, appraise, appraisal system
Amy D. (2005), Business & Economics performance
appraisal handbook, Legal and practical rules for
management, A Labour, AD Collection, in Spain
Armstrong N. (2005), Managing performance, Rluwer
academic publishers, Dorderecht, Wallsten.
Charles (1997), A healthy approach to performance
appraisal, Blue Willow and Sequoia publisher, London.
Cohen G.A (1994), Personnel Management theory and
practice, University of South Carolina press.
Cole M. (2006), Education, Equality and Human Rights
issues of Gender, Race, Sexuality, Disability and Social.
Taylor and Francis Ltd, London.
Conlon (1991), Personnel Management. The utilization
of Human resources, South – Western publishing company,
Delpo(2005) Performance appraisal systems. Capital
Dwirendi I. (1999) Management and organization, South
– Western publishing company, West Chicago.
Edwin B. (1996) Personnel management McGraw – Hill
book company, New York.
George S. (2005), Management by objectives and
performance appraisal. Director of the Bureau of industrial
relatives at united of Michigan
Graham (1996), Management and economics handbook
(7th edition) Longman group, U.K Ltd.
Grote (1996), The complete guide to performance
appraisal, North West Academic libraries Net library
collection business, Amazon.
John (2001), 360-degree feedback strategies, tactics and
techniques for developing leaders, partner home programme
Khotari CR (1990) Research methodology. Methods
and Techniques. Wishwa Prakashan, New Delhi.
KU Module, (2003) Managing men, Kenyatta
Lawler (1990), Rewarding civil servants performance
through team bonuses, findings analysis and
recommendations, Emery International, Sweden.
Lloyd H (1997) Business & Economics the
performance and appraisal review in academic settings,
casing a promised land, St. Chicago.
Mugenda O.M (1999) Research Methods, Quantitative
and Qualitative approaches. Nairobi Acts Press.
Oberg (2006), Environmental Management and
Communication, Springer Johansson Anna Larisson from
Opiyo, H. (2006). Civil Service Reform Policy in
Kenya: A review of the Retrenchment Strategy: Discussion
Paper Series: Institute of Policy Analysis and Research.
Palled (1999), An analysis of work group diversity,
conflict and performance, Clarkson Porter, New York.
Peter W. (2006), Appraisal systems and to make them
work, Island of New foundland. Robert B. (2005), Communication and effective
performance appraisal, PDF/Adobe Acrobat, Texas.
Richard (Sep 2006), Performance Appraisal tools,
Lubra TC Campus St. Lucie West, NATO.
Saleem (1997), Management Principles and practice
simplified 1st edition July.
Shawn S. (1995), Employee performance process,
Frank case publishers, Texas.
Tobias (2003), Organizational behaviour – Kenyatta
Utah (2006), Country Commission Government –
appraisal systems, Utah State library, Utah.