The Study of Principal Leadership Effect and School Culture on work Motivation and Teacher Performance in Private Vocational High School of Makassar City
Downloads
Implementation of learning in schools is largely determined by the performance of teachers which is influenced by various factors such as principal's leadership and school culture. This study aimed to comprehend the influence of school principal leadership and school culture on work motivation and performance of private Vocational High School teachers in the city of Makassar. This study used primary data through a survey of 260 teachers as respondents with a minimum of four years of teaching experience at 65 private Vocational High School in Makassar city. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) program with Amos 18 software facility. The results of this study indicated that the leadership of principals and school culture affect the motivation and performance of teachers, then work motivation affect the performance either directly or as a variable intervening on the performance of private Vocational High School teachers in the city of Makassar
Ali, Muhammad. H. (2002). Guru dalam Proses BelajarMengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo offset.
Apuanur. (2010). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolahdan Pemberian Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Guru. Malang: Universitas Kanjuruhan.
Arman, Syamsul Bachri Thalib, and Darman Manda. (2016). “The Effect of School Supervisors Competence and School Principals Competence on Work Motivation and Performance of Junior High School Teachers in Maros Regency, Indonesia”.International Journal of Enviromental & Science Education, Vol. 11, No.15, 7309-7317. Look Academic Publishers.
Biget A. S. ‘et al’. (2010). Motivation Employees of the Publik Sector: Does Public Service Motivation Matter. International Public Management Journal, 13(3), 213 – 246.
Darmodiharjo, D. (2003). Peranan Guru dalam Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan, Analisis Pendidikan, Volume 1. No.3.
Day C. et. all.(2006). School of Education, University of Nottingham and London Institute of Education. Variations in Teachers’ Work, Lives and Effectiveness Research Report, No.734.
Day Christopher, et. all. (2007). Teachers Matter Connecting work, lives and Effectiveness.Open University Press, McGraw-Hill Companies, England.
Ditpsmk. (2006). Kurikulum SMK 2006, Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Gani Umar Mursalim, S. (2006). Karateristik Individu, Karateristik Pekerjaan, Karateristik Organisasi, Motivasi Kerja, Imbalan, Kinerjasertapengaruhnya Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja, Malang: Universitas Brawijaya.
Goleman, Daniel. (2000). Leadership That Gets Result”.Harvard Business Review, USA. March – April.
Hadari Nawawi. (2005). Administrasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: GunungAgung.
Hermanto, Didik Bambang. (2011). Korelasi Gaya Kepemimpinandan Motivasi Kerja Kepala Sekolah Terhadap Kinerja Guru. Malang: Universitas Kanjuruhan.
Jumadi.(2006). “Peranan Kultur Sekolah Terhadap Kinerja Guru, Motivasi Berprestasidan Prestasi Akademik Siswa”. Jurnal Penelitian Bappeda Kota Yogyakarta.Vol.1, No.1, halaman 20 – 27.
Kusmintardjo. (2003). Kepemimpinan Pembelajaran Kepala Sekolahdalammening katkankinerja Guru: Studi Multi Kasus Pada Dua SMU di Kota Pemalang. UniversitasNegeri Malang.
Leithwood Kenneth, Steinbach Rosanne, Jantzi Doris. (2002). “School Leadership and Teachers Motivation to Implement Accountability Policies”.Journal Education Administration Quarterly.Vol.38. No.1. 94 – 119.
Lunenburg, Fred.C. and Ornstein, Allan C. (2000). Educational Administration: Consepts and Practices. Third Edition Belmont USA: Wardsworth.
Made Wena.(2006). Pendidikan System Ganda. Bandung: ITB Press.
Moerdiyono. (2010). Artikel Budaya Sekolah, http://staff.uny.ac.id C
Natsir Muhammad. (2011). Pengaruhgaya Kepemimpinan, BudayaOrganisasi, Kompetensi, dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Guru Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri di Kota Makassar. Makassar: Unversitas Muslim Indonesia.
NurKholis. (2003). Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah, Teori, Model danAplikasi. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Nurhayati. B. (2006).Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Profesionalismedan Kinerja Guru Biologi di SMAN Kota Makassar Sulawesi Selatan. Makassar: Mimbar Pendidikan No.4/XXV/2006.
Rebore, R. W. (1991). Personnel Administration In Education. Management Approach, Third Edition. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, Inc. New Jersey.
Rupert, Evans. (1978). TujuanPendidikan. Bandung: PustakaInsan Madani.
Sadiman.(2002). Interaksidan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar: Pedomanbagi Guru dan Calon Guru. Jakarta: CV. Rajawali
Samson Girma (2016). “The Relationship Between Leadership Style, Job Satisfaction and Culture of The Organization”. International Journal of Applied Research; 2 (4): 45 – 45.
Sibrronullisi. (2013). Pengaruh Antara Gaya Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah, Motivasi Kerja, dan Lingkungan Sekolah Terhadap Kinerja Guru. Malang: Universitas Kanjuruhan.
Soetopo, Hendyat. (2010). Perilaku Organisasi: Teoridan Praktik di Bidang Pendidikan, Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Somech Anit and Wenderow. (2006). “The Impact of Participative and Directive Leadership on Teachers’ Performance: The Intervening Effects of Job Structuring, Decision Domain and Leader-Member Exchange”. Journal Education Administration Quarterly.Vol. 42. No.5. 746 – 772.
Steers, R.M., Ungson, G.R., & Mowday, R.T. (1986). Managing Effective Organization, Allyn and Bacon. Boston.
Suharsaputra Uhar. (2010) Administrasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: RefikaAditama
Sulistinah. (2013). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinandan Kinerja Kepala Sekolah Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Guru. Malang: UniversitasKanjuruhan.
Suryadi, A., &Tilaar, H.A.R. (2004). Analisis Kebijakan Pendidikan: Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Veithzal Rivaidan Deddy Mulyadi. (2011). Kepemimpinandan Perilaku Organisasi, Jakarta: PT Raja GrafindoPersada.
Winardi. (2002). Motivasidan Pemotivasiandalam Manajemen. Jakarta: PT Raja GrafindoPersada.
Wirawan.(2009). Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia, (Teori, Aplikasi, dan Penelitian). Jakarta: SalembaEmpat.
YaslisIlyas. (2002). Kinerja Teori, Penilaian, dan Penelitian ,Depok: Pusat Kajian Ekonomi Kesehatan FK UI.
